(Not a good look.)
So why this head now? There are two primary competing views.
One holds that Lerner finally recognized a supposed mistake in hiring a coach before a GM this off-season, and now seeks to remedy that failure and install a GM who'd serve as an adequate "check and balance" on Eric Mangini's power.
The other, we think better, view is that the decision to dump Kokinis was more a vote of confidence in Mangini than an assault on his power. There are credible reports that the Mangini/Kokinis relationship was doomed from the start -- that Kokinis was promised final say on personnel decisions when hired but was nevertheless forced to take a back seat to Mangini, thus poisoning the relationship between the two. This view is supported by Kokinis' virtual invisibility since joining the franchise.
On this second view, Kokinis was eventually going to have to be replaced with a manager having a more clearly defined role, theoretically allowing for a better working relationship with the head coach, and a more productive management team. The timing in this case was likely more of a public relations move than anything else, resulting from the current unprecedented level of public criticism of the franchise's management.
Lerner's apparent capitulation to the whims of the angry mob might prove especially costly here, as the franchise has been scrambling to justify firing Kokinis "with cause" to avoid the obligation to pay on his contract and mitigate the potential that Kokinis combines assets with Butch Davis, Romeo Crennel and Phil Savage to purchase the UK's National Portrait Gallery only to run the organization into the ground. A more circumspect approach would likely have allowed for the organization to more efficiently build its case before giving Kokinis the greater incentive to lawyer up.
Though on the bright side (we guess?) the Browns might already have all the "cause" they need. The franchise "need[s] something more substantive and tangible than general allegations of poor performance" to justify firing Kokinis "with cause," which suggests violation of a specific contractual provision. Reports that the front office has been scouring Kokinis' phone records combined with the firing last week of front-office flack Erin O'Brien for "personal reasons," give us reason to wonder if the operative "cause" here might be violation of a clause prohibiting Kokinis from entering romantic relationships with subordinates. If it's not this, or something similarly "Real World-ly" tangible, then the fact that the "fired for cause" angle hit the press in the first place is more indicative of managerial incompetence in Berea than anything we've seen on the football field.
In any event, combing for evidence of cause to fire a man who was himself hired on the most questionable terms is just par for the course in Randy Lerner's Brownstown.
And par for the course in Randy Lerner's Brownstown takes us directly to the problem with the notion of a GM and head coach of relatively equal power checking and balancing one another; that such an arrangement requires a competent owner to give effect to the checks and balances. Thus, while a tripartite system might be preferable with all else equal, here in Cleveland under Lerner's stewardship, unitary executive power might be our only hope. And we still cling to ours, that Mangini can succeed in Cleveland under such a model, and that the effect of Kokinis' departure is to further consolidate Mangini's power, or at least to more clearly define it, and make room for a GM who will work well with the coach.
But whatever the new arrangement is to be, one man bears primary responsibility for the old one being such a mess in the first place. If it had to get worse before it got better when Romeo Crennel and Phil Savage were replaced, it didn't have to get this bad.
In light of the Kokinis mess, we'll admit that we've been too hard on Dawg Pound Mike and Co. in at least one respect. Our primary criticism of their protest is rooted in the belief that Mangini deserves at least two seasons worth of patience in rebuilding a franchise that's in such historic shambles, but in light of the Kokinis mess, it's becoming increasingly clear that if Mangini's time runs out before he succeeds, then Lerner's time is up too.
Whatever the problems with the protest, its success in marshaling a certain public sentiment can't be denied. Vague protest statements are one thing, even when they're written about by ESPN and SI. A serious public discussion about eminent domain proceedings and the concept of "public use" is something else. Laugh, just like they did when somebody said a black man could be mayor. If it could happen anywhere, it's here. And if it could happen to anyone, it's Master Randolph.
----------
As a postscript, and in response to reports that Bernie Kosar is being groomed for the GM role, we'll note that we're all for it, despite certain snidely-voiced concerns regarding Kosar's personal life. Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment. We think this job is just the thing for him, and are especially optimistic about the prospects of a Mangini/Kosar team. Mankos? Mansar? Kosini?
Thanks to Joshua Gunter and The Plain Dealer for the image.


48 comments:
Had to wait all this time for this? okay well this will be the last article i read here. Maybe i was wrong go back to picking games against the spread.
The "coach as GM" model has rarely been successful in the NFL, even after the person established that they were a great coach, which Mangini hasn't done (not saying that he doesn't have the potential or that he is bad, but he hasn't demonstrated with consistently good teams that he is great). Everything I have read (espn and cleveland.com) suggests that Kokinis was Mangini's "hand-picked" GM. I think Mangini should get the benefit of the doubt on the coaching side, but he hasn't done anything to prove he is even a decent GM (nothing in NYJ counts, because he didn't have that authority here). I get your general defense of the regime, but I think you are on a thin limb in suggesting that Mangini should have a subordinate GM.
verification = imiateri
screw browns football come over to clowns and read up on a real sport over here in our country. your american football is for pansies and touchers.
Clowns'd
Good job on probing into the issue. I wish I had an answer. I wish any of us had an answer. Can we clone Paul Brown? Is that legal?
One bone of contention, I find it distasteful and downright reckless to speculate that with cause means he dated a subordinate. I don't think you have the deadspin insiders quite yet. If you do, please feel free to enlighten us.
you should be ashamed that you referenced this in your post, what insider info do you have of this subordinate? if none leave this out of your post please.
Frownie,
I don't understand. You defend Lerner through 10 years of passive incompetence, and then the minute he starts acting like he cares, you say he needs to go? The only mistake he made yesterday was not firing Mangini.
When are you going to figure it out. Mangini doesn't deserve a chance. He's a bad guy. The fans hate him. The players hate him. He has no winning track record. He was a disastrious hire. The quicker Lerner just accepts that, writes the buyout check, and moves on, the better we'll all be. And then, from the point on, here is what needs to happen.
1. Hire team President
2. Team President hires GM
3. GM hires head coach
Lerner isn't selling. The Browns are never going to be owned by Cleveland. We just have to stop, level the current regime, and start building one from the ground up . . . the right way.
Edge: I think it's a good point regarding how far Mangini should be trusted with personnel decisions, but the point re: a subordinate GM is that with an arbiter who's as incompetent as Lerner, a unitary executive might be our only hope. Though I suppose there's a chance that we get lucky, and our new GM is peaches to Mangini's cream.
Stone: Thanks. Taste is one thing, but I don't think it's at all reckless to speculate about an affair here under the circumstances. Such a contractual clause is common, the timing of the departures is suspicious, and what else would he have been doing with the phone so as to occasion examination of his phone records? Any other ideas are welcome here.
Biff, you must not read much here. I've always been critical of Lerner. So critical that I cling to the notion of Mangini as falling into his lap as our only hope.
And I'm not saying I have a source on a romantic relationship. I'm just asking questions as the circumstances dictate.
That's an angle I never thought of. While I do think that it is some pretty extreme speculation, it might make more sense than my initial thought that they were checking his phone records to see if he was actually doing something more than just ordering carryout and sulking about having his "final say" status taken away. I was picturing him in acting like George Costanza.
Why does a unitary executive have to have Mangini on top? I see nothing wrong with bringing in a GM and subordinating Mangini to him. This is not at all inconsistent with Mangini changing the culture of the Browns. Obviously you need a GM that can work with Mangini (and vice versa), but letting Eric focus on coaching (while giving him input on the player acquisition side, the normal model) might be the best way to go.
absolutly terrible that you would drag Kokinis name through the mud suggesting an affair with someone in the organization. You should be ashamed. source???????? Kokinis is a dedicated husband and father who has done nothing in his past to say otherwise.
I did not have sexual relations with that man.
Wait, can you define what "is" means?
Jack: I don't need a source to ask a question. Whatever "decent" is, it's not an uncommon thing for bosses to sleep with subordinates. The "with cause" investigation by the Browns suggests violation of some kind of "morals" clause. Female subordinate was fired for "personal reasons" last week. I'm just asking the question.
If it might be malpractice for Kokinis' own lawyers not to ask the same question, then it has to be perfectly fair for me to ask here.
Edge: The reason I'd suppose that Mangini would have to be on top is that I suppose the unitary executive model only works if that exec is the coach -- the guy who's calling who starts and who's calling the plays.
I think it just terrible to say that about George, just hard for me to read this crap about him by you bloggers. He is a devoted family man and would never engage in such reckless acts such as you are now.
It doesn't have to be a morals clause. It could be your garden variety insubordination.
Biff: Didn't say it had to be a "morals" clause, but violation of a "morals" clause seems like it would be a lot easier to prove than "garden variety insubordination." Who was Kokinis supposed to be subordinate to, anyway.
Jack: Look man, I'm not saying he's a bad guy, or that that kind of thing definitely happened. Just that it's a possibility. Stuff happens. People do things. Even good people.
This is Mangini's first season and, as difficlut as it is, patience is needed. He is implementing his system and his players. This team jettisoned two players that had to go, K2 and Edwards. Building a winning atmosphere with these guys as your veterans, was not going to happen. Unfortunately, they were the only playmakers this team had. You have to go backwards to go forward. The best example I can give is Tony Dungy's first year in Tampa. He started 1-7. The next year he made the play-offs. The difference is Tony already had, from Sam Wych, Sapp, Brooks, Lynch, and Alstott.
The Browns are a disgrace and clearly the worst run team in the NFL, yes even worse than the Raiders who at least have a Super Bowl appearance in the past 10 years.
So now the plan is for Ernie Accorsi to groom Bernie to be an executive? Ernie is 92 freakin years old!
Bern and Ernie, may be good enough for Sesame Street, but come on Lerner, you can do better.
Cavs basketball, tonight's the night!
Kosar does not seem like a wise choice to me. In a league where only 7 coaches are former players, it seems to make even less sense for a player to be the GM. These are management jobs now, and jobs for which you should be prepared: learning on the fly is idiotic and doomed to abject, humiliating failure.
Bry: I hear you on former players as GMs, generally, but I just think Bernie's "That Guy." Think it could be something really special. And if you're right? Consider, Bernie really might be the most beloved person in Ohio, and if you end up being right, at least a whole state will take whatever happens to heart.
Good comment via Twitter from nupoet, who said:
"Interesting article Frownie and mostly agree but didnt Lerner build Aston Villa into a successful team?"
Our response:
"Decent question, but pretty sure Lerner just threw loads of $ at AstonVilla. Nice in league w/o a salary cap but not 'building.'"
Thoughts?
Great look, re: Dungy, PETER. And he already had all those building blocks.
Bernie is "that guy"??? That guy who is tens of millions of dollars in debt? Who hasn't run a successful business, let alone even being employed by an NFL Front Office. What exact merits does Bernie have in being a President of Football operations??????
This is getting beyond ridiculous, I can't believe that fans actually want Bernie to run the team. What a joke.
I feel about Bernie the same way I felt about Ainge. And look, Ainge did what he did and made it work, but until the Garnett trade it almost drove Pierce out of town. He was a good drafter, sure. But he was way in over his head.
And that's basketball. Football is so much more complex it's dizzying. I hear you w/r/t hometown hero. I'm just worried.
Ainge was a head coach in the NBA for a few years, I don't see the parallel other than that they plalyed for their respective teams that they are currently employed by.
I love Bernie, he's the pride of Boardman, but the dude is not nearly qualified to become a GM in this league at this juncture.
And yes, running a football team is MUCH harder than NBA. 52 man roster versus a 14 man roster is just the tip of the iceburg on the differences.
Comparing Ainge to Bernie vis a vis intelligence/GM capabilities is an insult to Bernie.
I love Bernie, but aren't you sort of, um, I don't know, overlooking the fact that he's a complete trainwreck!
You're going to hand over your billion dollar franchise to that guy?
Read the "Berning Liver" post linked here. Not overlooking anything.
And not "handing over" anything. Just adding extra brains to the Mangeniusness.
Whatever my former beefs with Ainge, he did get the team a title. So I'm not sure it's an insult. Actually, I'm sure it's not. Nice try, though.
Add more brains? We need an established, credible voice to run the football operations since obviously Lerner is not qualified or up to the task. Here you have been mocking Lerner all these years and now you want him to hire Bernie to run the team? And yes, that is exactly what we need, someone to run the team.
It seems completely contradictory to pimp football as the consummate team game and basically encourage the team to hire a cheerleader to run it. Maybe he'd be good for the job. But you shouldn't give it to him because of where he's from. You need to focus on where you need to get.
I think you're missing my point, which is that Bernie hung over beats Ainge on 10 out of 10 different IQ tests, 10 out of 10 times each.
what's your beef with Ainge anyhow?? mormon hater
I hate Mormons.
Wait, that's not it.
Can't really have a beef anymore. He seemed to be pretty directionless until the KG trade. Said he had a three-year "plan" when he came in and kept saying things were part of a "plan" when it seemed pretty dubious. As I said, good drafter, but after three years they were still trash. But as I said, now's not a problem so much.
But yes, Frownie, you are 100% right on that one.
my bad B, that was directed at Frownie, he seems to have an issue with Ainge's intelligence, just curious as to why he on god's earth he thinks Bernie has a higher IQ than him.. i love the Bern Dog, but he ain't the sharpest tool in the shed.
btw, seems like the Shaq/Z combo is getting better by the minute... even the AP writers have to agree:
The Cavs have been using the 7-foot-1 O'Neal and his 7-foot-3 backup, Zydrunas Ilgauskas, together with mixed results. But the pair are getting more comfortable and confident with every second they spend on the floor and have the potential to be a matchup nightmare for any team.
Knew you are an idiot biff. stop criticizing brown for his rotation. Z/shaq combo is a matchup nightmare for most teams. did it take you a whole week to figure this out. Cleveland Frowns why is biff your cavs guy? gawd.
I told y'all about them cavs. they are rolling through teams now. They will roll through the playoffs into the championship. Cant wait for that parade downtown to see Shaq rap a little bit. You heard it here first.
The S man
"1. Hire team President"
Browns already have one.
Bonus points if you can name him.
They've beaten some fairly weak teams in this 3 game streak, but yes, good to see the defense playing well, the offense will come as the season progresses.
Good to see Boobie in the mix.
browns president is Keenan. He has been with the browns in many different positions in recent years.
Refresh the home page. New post is up.
Re: Aston Villa's moderate success: Lerner is a hands-off owner there as well, and he believes the success AV has found are based on that -- getting the right people to run and manage the franchise. In that light, his history with the Browns is completely understandable. He got a coach/manager (one person with all the power) at AV who has done a good job. Lerner has stated he wants him to build a dynasty.
Good article and very valid to raise questions. Why is everyone so down on Bernie? I have no idea if he'll make a good GM or not. However, it cannot be denied that he has a very keen fotball IQ and will be an asset in some capacity. Furthermore, wasn't he the GM of the Las Vegas franchise in the AFL that relocated to Cleveland after posting the leagues worst record, then played in the championship game the next season. I know it's not the NFL but don't say he has no experience turning around a franchise.
In case you missed it, the Cavs flipped the switch last night when they went small in the second quarter. Not when Z and Shaq were lumbering up and down the floor.
Anon: Re: Aston Villa's moderate success, it's easy to dump money into a team in a league with no salary cap, and be hands off. The is something entirely different.
Thanks for the comment, and especially for the reminder that AV's success has been moderate.
Biff: The masses want to hear from you.
Biff made a post earlier about how cavs made a run with a small lineup. And I think we definitely will probably be more efficient offensively without the twin big fellas in at the same time. But obviously what coach brown likes is the defensive presence it provides and while still a massive work in progress, they did clog the lanes last night preventing Gil to attack the rim like he normally does.
I applaud coach brown for experimenting as this is the time to work things out in the lab so that come playoff time we've got a bunch of different rotations/lineups to choose from based on matchups.
Btw, anyone notice how beefed up and in shape ben wallace looks? He had 10 boards and some blocks last night in the stones win over the magic.
Post a Comment