NFL Conference Championship Picks

by Cleveland Frowns on January 24, 2010

If we’re able to extend this perfect run of 2009 NFL playoff picking here to 10-0, two of the most overvalued narratives of 2009 will have been put to rest by Sunday’s end.

Colts -8 over the Jets (30 units):  The first being the one holding that Rex Ryan led the Jets to “another level” this season.  The Jets 9-7 record this year came against teams with a .516 winning percentage and two that laid down for the Jets in the season’s final two weeks, while last season’s 9-7 record was earned against teams with a .568 winning percentage.

The Jets benefited from playing an overrated Bengals unit that was never the same after losing Chris Henry, then enjoyed a playing-surface-aided win that was gift wrapped by Norv Turner and the Chargers.  And now we’ll benefit from the same because we’d take the Colts here if the line was 12.

Some of it’s run-of-the-mill Jet fan mania.  The kind that compares Ryan to Bill Parcells, and Mark Sanchez with Joe Namath.

Another absurd line is one we’ve read from several respected voices (No names, please!) telling us that the Colts deserve “karmic punishment” for resting starters instead of prioritizing an undefeated season before a Super Bowl win.  Punished for trying to win a championship?  What can you say?

The Jets wouldn’t have the league’s top rated rushing attack if they could move the ball through the air.  And their top ranked defense benefited from the fact that teams who beat them generally didn’t have to move the ball very much to do so.  In addition to the two against teams that didn’t play, six games against the Bills, Dolphins, Bucs, and Raiders helped inflate the Jets numbers as well, especially against the pass.

The Jets can’t get a pass rush with out a blitz, and this week Shaun Ellis will play without a broken hand.  Manning has thrown some picks this season, including last week, but the hobbled Kerry Rhodes (ankle) is no Ed Reed, even when he’s healthy.  Also, John Clayton mentioned this week that the Jets are vulnerable to top tight ends.

The Jets crowed this week about playing the Colts starters even for a half in Week 15, but Football Outsiders pointed out that the Colts had several missed opportunities in that game, and played without the bookend pass rushers around whom their defense is built (Mathis sat the whole game, and Freeney played only on third down).  It’s hard to see the Jets having much more success moving the ball against these Colts than Chris Johnson and the Titans, who were shut down by the Colts in weeks 5 and 13.

The Jets won their Super Bowl last week.  The bandwagon’s now way too heavy (witness, for example, ESPN’s odds expert Chad Millman jumping on during Simmons’ podcast after being against the Jets for the first two weeks of the playoffs).  I couldn’t be happier to jump off to join the best quarterback in the NFL and one of the best run organizations in all of sport here (must read on Colts owner Jim Irsay by L. Jon Wertheim here).

Folks are speculating as to whether the Colts will be sorry for letting these Jets into these playoffs, in something of a Frankenstein scenario.  It seems more to me like the mother who tells the child, “I brought you into this world, and I can take you out too.”

I generally don’t play totals, but think the talk about the Jets defense is overblown enough here to justify a play on OVER 40 (5 units) as well.

Saints -3.5 over the Vikings (30 units):  Vikings backers are paying too much for Favre here, and the notion that he’s playing better now than at any point in his career.  The Vikings system suits him well, for sure, and his stats reflect that.  But what helped more was games against the Bears (twice), Lions (twice), Niners, Browns, Rams, Seahawks, and a deflated Giants unit with nothing to play for in the season’s final week.  Favre and the Vikes also benefited from playing both of their games against the Packers in the season’s first eight weeks, before Green Bay’s rookie-laden defense had gotten it together for the Pack’s strong late season run.

The Vikings opponent of this season that looks the most like these Saints is the Cardinals, who thumped the Vikes in Arizona in week 13.

Don’t overrate the Vikings win last week over the Cowboys.  We told you last week that the Vikes were a bad match for a Cowboys team that struggled against balanced offensive attacks, and depended on play action to set up its passing game.  In-game injuries to two Cowboys offensive linemen, a pair of circus touchdowns by Favre, and terrible in-game decisions by the Cowboys staff (like a FG attempt (that missed) on 4th and 1 in the 1st when the Cowboys were having no trouble picking up yards on the ground) made things much worse here.

No such luck for the Vikes this weekend.  New Orleans is an awful matchup for them, especially in the noisy dome where the Vikings pass rush will have a harder time getting off the ball (the Vikings defense has struggled on the road all season).  The Saints strength attacking downfield goes directly to the Vikings weakness in the secondary (worse, with Winfield limited to nickel duty), and Pat Williams and Ray Edwards are both banged up along the defensive line.  The Cowboys weren’t able to exploit the green Jasper Brinkley filling in for E.J. Henderson in the middle last week, but it’s hard to see the Saints not taking advantage of this hole.  The Vikings are prone to tackling problems, and we wouldn’t be surprised to see those resurface tomorrow.

On the other side, Gregg Williams has turned the Saints defense around.  As noted last week, the unit’s been underrated all season, its success hidden by numbers inflated by injuries to key parts and frequent big leads.  According to the folks at Football Outsiders, Favre has struggled this year against the blitz, and the Saints play some of the most blitz-heavy defense in the NFL.  Percy Harvin’s migraines don’t help here, but even with Harvin, I don’t expect Minnesota to keep up.

Like the Jets, the Vikings seemed at least a little bit too happy after last week’s win (talking more “Tasmanian devils” than “Pants on the Ground,” here).  I’ll be glad to see both of them gone by tomorrow night.  I wouldn’t be surprised to see two blowouts.

Colts vs. Saints is one of the best Super Bowl matchups we’ll have seen since when?

Enjoy!

*Note: I made a 25 unit play on the Jets to win the game at +280 (2.8-1), but only to hedge against my 30 unit 6-1 play on the Colts to win the Super Bowl from October.

  • smittypop2

    I think the Colts is the right call….but I don't trust Manning in the playoffs. He just went to 8-8 in his playoff career last weekend and has choked the playoffs away plenty of years. The Colts CAN NOT run the ball like the Jets CAN NOT pass the ball.I think the game could actually be close. I would have to pick the Jets if a gun was to my head….I also have to go with Favre and the Vikings in the other game. I think they will win outright if they play a decent game. I feel like they are the more talented team and AP is finally going to have a decent game in the playoffs (read multiple TDS and 100+ yards). Those are my feelings and I am merely 4-4 in these mighty playoffs. I wish you luck though sir!

  • Sam Sneeda

    Frowner,

    I agree with you on so much of what you write about Mangini and Rex Ryan and feel that the Jets are over-hyped…they went 9-7 just like the Jets last year and got lucky that this year it meant a playoff birth…who knows how far last year's Jets would have gone if given a playoff birth, regardless of "rankings"…who really cares if a defense is ranked #1 or #20 if the end result is the same (Biki)? So, really I agree with so much of what you write; however, I don't get this…

    "teams who beat them generally didn't have to move the ball very much to do so."

    help me out…what does that mean? Did the Jets turn the ball over alot in their own territory? Did other teams score alot of special team TDs? Help me understand this, please?

  • Believelander

    It's can mean a combination of things, Sam, but generally means that in those games, it's less of own-territory turnovers and more of an issue of not getting the spark on offense. When you don't advance the ball like the Browns, your opponents need to move the ball less and less in a 'punt war' to eventually win the battle of attrition.

    But turnovers and less than stellar special teams can come into play – from all I've read though the Jets have good special teams defense.

  • Bryan

    GO FROWNIE

  • LDUTheCoach

    The majority of people are taking the Colts to kill the Jets this
    week but you have to consider how well New York matches up against
    Indy. Indy has the worst running game in the league, and is ALL
    Peyton. The Jets have the #1 pass-defence and if they can put the
    clamps on Peyton early… it could very well be a Jets win. TheCoach
    isn’t calling a J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS win but they will cover the
    spread. I know Indy shut down Baltimore’s running game last week
    but the Jets strive on being quick and elusive.. something Ray Rice
    isn’t…

    Minnesota and New Orleans is going to be such a good game. I was
    hoping all season long these two would meet up in the NFC
    Championship and honestly.. either team could team this game. The
    Saints are -3.0 favourites and historically home team get given three
    points for the home-field advantage… so basically this game is a
    pick-em and there is ONE thing that I like about the Saints and its
    that home-field advantage. Last week Warner and Romo combined for 7
    sacks and 4 fumbles largely in part to not being able to communicate
    with their offence. The SuperDome is NUTS and I don’t care how much
    experience Favre has, the crowd can help a team and also hurt the
    other so much.

    Feel free to check out my picks with scores (and of course
    cheerleader pictures) @
    http://www.lionsdenu.com/category/sports/nfl-guide-2009-2010/

    Best of luck to all this week,
    Regards,
    TheCoach

  • Believelander

    I would go with Frownie on this weekend's picks, but I feel as if changing the status quo from the last few weeks could disrupt his chi, and I wouldn't want to cause anyone to lose any money.

    So I'm picking the Vikings and Jets for the Super Bowl, and after the Colts – Jets game, I'll be on to post a comment to the air of,

    "Good call there Frown, but you're gonna bite the dust on this next one, hombre!"

    LoL. In the words of my esteemed colleague Braylon Edwards, whom my uncle has met a few times and refers to as "that d*ckhead",

    "J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS"

  • reinisr

    Well, your predictions where right, especially about Colts-Jets, the other game could have gone both ways, but anyway vikes outplayed themselves as it was expected.

    Jets didn't get that far without good share of pure luck – had SD made at least one of those fg or not committed that dumb 15yd penalty. And even the top experts are so biased predicting the next game from the previous one – most nfl.com analysts predicted Jets would win.

    Superbowl is pretty much unpredictable this year, but would bet that it is not going to be such high scoring game as most experts are saying at the moment. Both teams will try the conservative approach. And the winner will be the one that wants it more.

    On the paper Saints seem to be favorites because they they played better against common opponents (AFC east, especially Patriots) but their explosing offensive game style might hurt themselves this time. I say if the game stays on not very high score Colts will take it, but if it goes wild Saints will win.

Previous post:

Next post: