Xs and Os with the Bros: Brooks and Done — How a Backup Rookie Linebacker Blew Up the Browns Passing Game and Nearly Murdered Colt McCoy

by Cleveland Frowns on November 10, 2011

Welcome to the latest edition of “Xs and Os with the Bros” by Xs and Os editor @rodofdisaster. This feature represents a basic attempt to dive deeper into the game of football, learn something about the X’s and O’s, and try to appreciate the games within the game by taking a close look at a single play. It’s called “Xs and Os with the Bros” because you don’t have to be a rocket surgeon or a former NFL player or coach to get something out of taking a close look at a football play, so please enjoy the post and the discussion in the comments. OK, here’s Rod:

Colt McCoy threw 1,645 passes as quarterback for the University of Texas, and it’s doubtful that he was ever under as much duress as he was over the 25 or so snaps where he dropped back on Sunday in Houston. Texans rookie linebacker Brooks Reed, forced into a starting position when star Mario Williams went on the IR, had roughly one sack in every three games he played at the University of Arizona.  On Sunday, Reed sacked McCoy twice and hit him on four other occasions.  And Reed didn’t just hit McCoy, he punished him. Quite honestly, the Browns made him look like Lawrence Taylor, as he exposed the weakness in the Browns’ pass protection in just about every possible way.

First some basic background: Every pass play that’s called defines a formation as well as the routes that the receivers run. A QB’s drop will vary from 3 to 5 to 7 steps based on the depth of the routes, and every play will have a pass protection scheme to organize the blockers.

From there, the QB has a pre-snap read to try and determine the front, coverage and the expected pressure.  He needs to understand if he’ll be able to get the designated play off on the look he’s getting from the defense. The blockers and receivers need to execute their assignments, and the QB needs to deliver the football on time. If they can’t accomplish these goals, the QB will have to know where his escape options are (to scramble).

Now, to see what might have gone so wrong on Sunday:

Situation: 4th quarter;
Score: Houston leads 30-6;
Down-Distance: 3rd & 5 on Houston 29;

I. Pre-snap

Here the Browns come out in “13” personnel — 1 back and 3 tight ends.  The strength of the formation is to the right. Earlier in the game, they passed from this formation. The Texans are in a 3-4 base defense. There are nine defenders “in the box”. The corner on Greg Little is showing man-to-man alignment and it appears that the two ILB and strong safety are aligning on the tight ends.  There is one deep safety. That usually suggests man to man underneath and a deep safety (man-free) or 3 deep zone (unlikely against this compact formation).  It appears as though 5 or 6 defenders could be coming on the rush.  Greg Little has 1-on-1 coverage with no help over the top for the Texans cornerback.

II.   The Rush

Here we see that the safety has dropped out into a single deep coverage and is reacting to the QB.  The yellow lines designate man-to-man coverage.  The coverage is pretty much what the presnap read suggested. We have five men rushing and five to block them. If Clayton stays in, his man will rush as well.

III.   Free Shot

Here we see three things:

1.      Clayton’s man sees him release and reverses field to go with him.

2.      Brooks Reed has yet another free shot on McCoy, which has to be put on a failed blocking scheme, or else a failure of the offensive linemen to execute the scheme. Note four Browns helmets blocking three Texans linemen to the right (the right guard, Lauvao, is effectively blocking no one here) while Reed takes his free run behind Thomas’s back. (You can read more about how zone and man pass blocking schemes at an “Anatomy of a Play” post from this year’s Miami game here).

3.      Greg Little has one on one coverage and he’s not looking back for the ball.  I’m not suggesting that he has to but he seems unaware of what’s going on back behind him which is a consistent finding with this young player.

IV.   Lights Out

One hopes that his team’s quarterback doesn’t take this type of hit regularly, but I saw it happen at least three times on Sunday. To his credit, McCoy kept getting up, and kept stepping up to deliver the football.

Discussion:  What we have here is basically a mess, with a lot of issues illustrated by these stills. It’s probably easiest to analyze by position.

Colt McCoy:  I was starting to come off of the Colt McCoy bandwagon after the Seattle game.  I fully expected to go to the Houston game and see that I was correct that Colt was the reason that this passing game could not get going.  It seemed like the easiest explanation.  Unfortunately for my sanity, it’s just not that simple.  Colt is limited in several ways.  First off, he isn’t as tall as you’d like. His arm isn’t strong enough to overcome the breakdown in mechanics that occurs when he’s under pressure.  He seems to be feeling the pressure sooner, possibly a result of being a punching bag for the better part of this season.  Sure, he will make a major league throw here and there but it’s never when he’s pressured.  On this play, he got the ball to Little but it was essentially a floating heave. Is he making the proper pre-snap reads? Is he not smart enough to diagnose what the defense is doing? The last four teams we’ve played have all brought edge pressure either by LB or DB with great results. I can’t believe that Colt doesn’t see this or that he’s somehow unable to adjust. He made a living making those types of adjustments in college (see Fiesta Bowl winning TD vs Ohio State). What if he’s not allowed to adjust? I didn’t see a single audible on Sunday and I can’t tell you that he’s audibled five times all year  I also notice in many plays that he takes a quick three step drop and tries to get rid of the ball only to find that the receiver isn’t looking for the quick throw.  I don’t know if these are designated hot routes. There certainly doesn’t seem to be a lot of pre-snap communication to suggest that there are.

With respect to pass protection, the QB has to determine one thing first and foremost: Does he have enough blockers to block the rush? If not then he has several options:

1) Call timeout

2) Change the play (audible)

3) Reassign the protection (this may fall to the center on some teams)

4) Throw a “hot route”.  This is a quick hitting pass route usually done as an adjustment by a receiver so as to get the ball out of the QB’s hands quickly.  Usually, you’ll see it as a slant route, and if it can be completed, it sometimes goes for huge gains if the DB misses the tackle. Dan Fouts commented that we seemed to be lacking these in our passing game. I suppose that one can argue that they’re built in with the nauseating number of short routes but it seems that the receivers simply aren’t on the same page with Colt.

As we can see above, he generally does have enough blockers. What’s disturbing is the Texans did not rush like a team like the Jets would.  They didn’t use a lot of overload blitzes bringing more hats than we had to block. In such cases, this case, there are enough blockers to handle the pressure so the Browns should commit to their protection scheme and pass routes and execute it.

I noticed during several plays when Colt dropped back that he started to feel the rush seemingly too early, and would miss receivers coming open.

Offensive Line:  The main question here isn’t whether they fail, because they surely collectively do.  The question is whether or not that failure is a result of the scheme that they’re given or their lack of ability to execute a pass block.  That probably varies from man to man. As we saw in the old “Anatomy” post linked above, Artis Hicks frequently gets beaten badly. Pashos is not much better.  The right side of the line has trouble in pass protection and some of that could just be physical inability. What you see more often than you’d like is this, from Sunday’s first half:

You simply can’t have this many offensive linemen on their butts.  Mack is the only one who’s looking like an NFL player here (with respect to the rest I really have no idea what’s going on).

On the other hand, when you see Artis Hicks gives Reed a free hit on McCoy in the 3rd quarter and then the Texans flip the play in the 4th quarter and Joe Thomas allows the same free run, you have to ask if there’s a schematic problem here.  If the offense is predictable to 95% certainty like Mike Lombardi says it is, it would naturally make things extremely difficult on the linemen, so as to compound the impact of any physical advantages held by the opponent (or negate any such advantages held by the Browns).

Receivers:  It’s clear that the Browns lack top-end superstar talent at the position, but the criticism of the abilities of the unit as a whole strikes me as overblown. Greg Little has made some plays, as is evident here, and could one day be a star in the league. It’s not hard to see Massaquoi or even Cribbs coming down with a 1,000 yard season in a different offense, but at this point the Shurmur attack simply isn’t getting any vertical stretch. This allows the defense to squat on the short zones, rush the passer with little risk and really just allows them to come up and smack the offense in the face; the same problem the Jets used to face with Chad Pennington. I think Colt’s arm is at least stronger than Chad’s, but in any event, my impression is that the teams we are facing are playing this defense because they know we a) want to run and b) aren’t going to send multiple vertical threats since our offense is predicated on these nauseating 5 yard passes.

On blitz plays, it seems like the receivers don’t look back for a quick throw when they should, which suggests that perhaps the receivers are the ones who aren’t understanding what they’re seeing out there or how to adjust to it, but how much should be communicated by the quarterback? While we’re not seeing miles of separation on the field (for many of the reasons discussed above), these guys are coming open in spots with relative frequency. One area where I’m sure this group could improve is with respect to fighting for the ball when it’s in the air.

In sum, there are a number problems with the Browns passing game. On some plays the breakdown is because they simply can’t block the guy in front of them. On other plays, the scheme isn’t clear and doesn’t account for all of the rushers. It may be a mental mistake on the part of the lineman or running back, a flaw in the blocking scheme, or simply McCoy’s error because he should know that the last (free) man is his responsibility. He does hold the ball too long on occasion, and will hitch and hesitate,  suggesting that a receiver is not where McCoy is expecting him to be. And it seems the receivers don’t always make the right route adjustment based on coverage (which is what led to the interception at the end of the second quarter).

Compounding these issues, it also appears that Colt lacks the ability or permission to audible. Falling to the same free rush a second time in two quarters calls the coach’s ability to adjust into question.

In any event, it’s hard to say more without knowing what the actual calls and schemes are, but Dan Fouts is surely right when he says that something simply doesn’t look right with the Browns’ approach. The passing game as it stands right now is a total disaster. One could argue that Brian Daboll didn’t expect much from Colt last year in terms of passing, but Colt was much more accurate in Daboll’s scheme, and I can’t believe that he’s all of a sudden lost that ability. Do I believe that Colt will be the Browns’ QB in two years? No; but I can’t jump to the conclusion that the QB is the only issue here because it seems like any of a number would struggle under the same circumstances.

For now we can just hope we’ll get a better look against the Rams, who’ve had eight defensive backs on their injured reserve list, are missing both first-stringers at corner, and will start 37 year old Al Harris, and Josh Gordy, a rookie who was cut by the Packers in training camp. Anyway, for the Browns passing game there’s really no place to go but up.

  • Anonymous

    but but but, but practice goes off without a hitch! we battle in practice. everything looks good, sound. we just have to practice better.

  • Anonymous

    This is SO not Cleveland.  How did anyone ever accumulate a consensus of intelligence, with contributors like Rod, here? FrOrange,  you’ve managed to extract lavender scent from a septic tank.

    I’m now a Rod groupie.

  • Ronnie James Dio

    Just wanted to comment on yesterday’s post regarding injuries.

    Frowns, while I agree completely with how disgusting the hypocrisy of the PD is, a team shouldn’t win without its best players or when its best players aren’t really that good in the first place. The #NoExcuses stuff is great for a pre-game pep talk, but the reality of the situation is that injuries do destroy team’s seasons.

    Maybe expectations were too coming into the seas after the team made games interesting last year before losing games, but the team is not good. And the team with a 100% healthy Hillis would still not be good.

    • Anonymous

      I don’t disagree with any of this at all. The point made yesterday was entirely with respect to the hypocrisy of the PD (and others), and also to the fact that we last year we had a coach who could win games without players, even though he shouldn’t have been able to (as you correctly note).

      • Ronnie James Dio

        Ok. We’re on the same page. 

        Oops on all the typos.

      • David McCullough

        While he may have “won games without players”, let us please note that 1) he was not bringing young players along (or this team wouldn’t look so bad), and 2) his record was 5-11.

        If you’ve been a terrible team for 10 years and you have to give playing time t0  over-the-hill veterans while cooking up tricks and screwy defensive schemes every week in order to finish far at .312, then I’d suggest there  is a problem. Every winning team in any professional sport gets there by building a foundation of young players that get beat up making their mistakes as the team finishes under .500 in their early years. Who exactly did the Browns develop last year (and the year before, and they year before that….)?

        • http://twitter.com/cpmack Chris M

          Which young players were not being brought along, Carl? Please be specific here. Rubin and Haden both looked very good, and T.J. Ward is simply awful in coverage. I’m not sure there is any fixing that. Who am I missing here?

          And pointing to 5-11 without wiping the thorazene-induced drool from your chin is not helping anything at all here, so stop it please.

          • David McCullough

            Tell you what……

            Which young players WERE brought along? Please be specific. Or were the 2 guys you mentioned above it?

            Who made all player moves in 2010?

            “And pointing to 5-11 without wiping the thorazene-induced drool from your chin is not helping anything at all here, so stop it please.”

            Gee, an interesting comment from a guy so demanding of specifics.

            The world is just full of Hunter Thomson wannabe’s that do it so poorly.

          • http://twitter.com/cpmack Chris M

            I’m not the one making claims that “young players weren’t being brought along”. But that is the reply I would have expected out of you.

            Nice to see you back, Mr Tassof.

        • http://twitter.com/cpmack Chris M

          Which young players were not being brought along, Carl? Please be specific here. Rubin and Haden both looked very good, and T.J. Ward is simply awful in coverage. I’m not sure there is any fixing that. Who am I missing here?

          And pointing to 5-11 without wiping the thorazene-induced drool from your chin is not helping anything at all here, so stop it please.

        • Anonymous

          I think its a bit unfair to say that Mangini couldn’t develop talent. He certainly did with the Jets. Yes, 2009 was a disaster personnel wise but he did win games with less talent. He took discards like Trusnik, Schaefering, Roth and plugged them in. I don’t care about winning with trickery. The Browns have not been good enough to compete straight up. You do what you need to do.

          Magnin’s Browns tenure will ultimately be flawed for several reasons but the man was initially told he would not be judged on wins immediately and then he was as the rules were changed on him the first bye week. I think at that point you need to win with vets. You don’t have the luxury of bringing rookies along. Mangini did develop Mack and Rubin as well as Haden. That’s probably not impressive enough for most but it’s a bit harsh to say that he had no eye for talent or its development given his previous history and the fact that over 20 cuts that he made when he arrived were of players who were mostly out of the league immediately.

          • Anonymous

            If by “a bit unfair” you mean “completely ridiculous” then I completely agree here.

          • Alexb

            This^^^^   mangini was building something and we could all feel it. The Defense took a step back last year cause I think guys were dinged up all year. But the Offense definitely took a dramatic step forward. He should have been given an extension just for the Hillis trade. Mangini was going to build an “AFC NORTH” offense/defense. That’s something that it doesn’t seem like alot of people here get. The game is played differently up here. We’re not west coast fags that put on a tantrum and throw 5 yd outs for the rest of the game once the opposing defense stopped the run for “1 whole quarter”. We pound the ball down your throat and up your ass for 3 quarters then start stretching you out……..ok that def sounded gay but you aholes know what I mean.

  • http://twitter.com/cpmack Chris M

    Anyone know where I could go to make a prop bet for the over / under on Steven Jackson’s total yards for this week? My guy won’t touch it.

    • Anonymous

      my book doesn’t have it either.. but i’d set it at 142 if you want action..  

    • Believelander

      Sqrt 1.07e^14.

  • David McCullough

    THUMBS UP!

    With seemingly dozens of people covering the Browns, one would think the PD would hire one person to  do something like this every day of the football season. But the PD has been moving to sensationalism in hopes of staying afloat.

    I agree totally on all points. When he was off a bit on one, he corrected it later. Example, the Texans didn’t have to come at McCoy with all sorts of fancy blitzes as the Jets do, they knew they could overpower him in the scheme he was in. And I agree that his arm is not strong enough. McCoy has had major problems when throwing outside the middle third of the field. He cannot throw left to save his life, and he can only throw right if he’s scrambling that way. The stuff he got away with in college will not work in the pros, where the game is so much faster. A QB cannot hang a ball in the air for any length of time, the DB’ s are simply too quick and will close.

    Yesterday I said that getting Sam Bradford at the end of he season was a possibility. But as Holmgren has stated, McCoy will be “evaluated” at the end of the season. And if he is not “THE” guy, then the Browns will search elsewhere. While the draft is an obvious possibility, one would think Heckert and his staff are checking out every back-up in the league. Holmgren did trade for Hasselbeck when Matt was an unwanted back-up. (Perhaps checking on young back-up QB’s with decent arms, accuracy and above average football IQ’s that are either playing back-up or soon to be replaced by their teams with a star from this years draft would be a nice basis for an article.)

    I reiterate how bad the O-Line is, particularly in pass blocking. I do think that both Pinkston and Lauvao will play in the NFL for at least 5-10 years – if suffering no major injuries – although one might wind up being a utility-type center-guard or guard-tackle, depending on how much size they ultimately grow into. But in the meantime they’re getting killed. Sometimes this works fantastically when we talk about the lines of Chuck Noll’s early Steelers and Jimmy Johnson’s early Cowboys. But most of the time it takes time to build quality O and D lines, and there are a lot of players coming-and-going until the lines are set. The right tackle position with the Browns has been an utter disaster for at least 5 years, and I do not for the life of me understand how 3 GMs – Savage, Mangini (who was really the GM) and Heckert – didn’t address that position quickly with either a high draft choice (was Brian Robiskie really needed in the high 2nd round when they had just drafted Massaquoi?), in free agency, or in a trade.

    A special thumbs up to Cleveland Frowns! Hopefully there will be more items like this every now and then before the season is over. And it must also be noted that with everyone from writers to talk show hosts to bloggers to ladies meeting at the DAR talking about Joe Paterno ad nauseam, Cleveland Frowns stayed on point, above the fray. Classy!

    • Anonymous

      just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse:  http://www.businessinsider.com/jerry-sandusky-donors-2011-11

      • http://hardawayhatespittsburgh.blogspot.com PittsburghisforManLovers

        Even if that isn’t true I’d stikl like to invite every nozzle that was protesting and vandalizing last night to take two steps back and literally eff their own faces. I wish perspective could be painfully administered and the victims and their families were the ones doing it.

        RIP Heavy D – many are called but the chosen are few

    • Ess Eh

      One back up QB to be a FA worth watching is Matt Flynn of the Packers.  He has showed some flashes of good play (last year vs the Pats).  But if not, there are 4 potential top ten QBs this year.  Luck, Barkley, Jones, and RGIII

      • Anonymous

        while i don’t think the book is closed on Colt because there def is something to be said about the talent (or lacktherof) he’s working with.  But i’m sure Heckert’s guys are keeping a close eye on the following on potentially signing or trading for:

        Jason Campbell (OAK)
        Jimmy Clausen (CAR)
        Ryan Mallet (NE)
        Caleb Hanie (CHI)
        Mike Kafka (PHI)
        Tyler Thigpen (BUF)

      • Anonymous

        hahah here’s something i tweeted the other day: “the thing i hate most about matt barkley is how much farther he can throw the ball than colt mccoy can”

        *i went to nd which is where the usc hate comes from - this tweet happened after nd got crushed by usc

    • Anonymous

      Thanks. Spencer Hall said all that needed to be said about the Penn State thing on Monday anyway. http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2011/11/7/2543948/penn-state-jerry-sandusky-joe-paterno-sex-abuse-case

    • Anonymous

      Thanks. Spencer Hall said all that needed to be said about the Penn State thing on Monday anyway. http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2011/11/7/2543948/penn-state-jerry-sandusky-joe-paterno-sex-abuse-case

    • Steve White

      Holmgren did trade for Hasselbeck when Matt was an unwanted back-up.
      He also traded for Delhomme. That didn’t work as we all know, but it demonstrates his MO.

      Holmgren is in the ‘quarterback a year’ club: he’ll draft, trade or FA for one every year until he finds the one he wants.

  • Anonymous

    everything here seems exactly right except this:  “i think Colt’s arm is at least stronger than Chad’s” – why do you think that?  i think the absolute very longest ball mccoy can throw while maintaining semi-accuracy (i’m not even requiring him to maintain real deal accuracy) is 30 yards.  pennington never had a great arm either, but it’s better than mccoy’s.  

    anyway thanks for the breakdown.  some people really have a talent for dead-pan comedy; yours is for dead-pan tragedy.  (what i mean by this is that i appreciate how hard it is to be as immersed in and informed about how awful the brownies are and still keep your cool by breaking it down in a professional, non-ranting manner.)

    also the best part of this whole thing is the eternal optimist ending - here’s hoping, for sure.   

    • Anonymous

      I’ve seen Chad play in person at least 5-6 times. I’ve seen Colt throw live 3 times. I know it isn’t a great sample size but I will tell you that Colt’s arm is stronger.

      • Anonymous

        i have never seen pennington in person. i have seen colt at basically every home game he’s ever played (i have season tix). on tv as a pro and from what i remember of him throwing to randy moss in college, i thought pennington was at least passable. i will take your word for it that his arm is worse than i thought, but it just means that they both have atrocious arms. :/

  • Anonymous

    everything here seems exactly right except this:  “i think Colt’s arm is at least stronger than Chad’s” – why do you think that?  i think the absolute very longest ball mccoy can throw while maintaining semi-accuracy (i’m not even requiring him to maintain real deal accuracy) is 30 yards.  pennington never had a great arm either, but it’s better than mccoy’s.  

    anyway thanks for the breakdown.  some people really have a talent for dead-pan comedy; yours is for dead-pan tragedy.  (what i mean by this is that i appreciate how hard it is to be as immersed in and informed about how awful the brownies are and still keep your cool by breaking it down in a professional, non-ranting manner.)

    also the best part of this whole thing is the eternal optimist ending - here’s hoping, for sure.   

  • Anonymous

    do we have any friends with press credentials who can ask shumur whether or not colt has permission to audible?

  • zarathustra

    Cheddar me up with the Chargers beat down of the Raiders tonight please. May be back to make it my money pick.

    • Anonymous

      I also want this pick. SORRY ZARATHUSTRA

      • Anonymous

        and i will take BOTH houston and the chargers tonite.

        (would love to take ou also but they are my personal kryptonite and i need to learn to stay away from them.)

  • Anonymous

    I’ll take some Thursday Cheddar action on Houston (-34.5) over Tulane.

  • Anonymous

    cheddar bookkeeping.

    these came in via twitter:
    fsozac –> ohiou;
    gavin-g –> o.u.;
    titus –> chargers.

    kanick –> houston and chargers.

    below i’ve got:
    GRR –> houston;
    NFB –> houston;
    zara –> chargers. 

    i think we’re up to date.  and we thank you for your support.

  • Anonymous

    Houston over Tulane please!

    • Anonymous

      Woah, people are leaping onto a huge spread here – I know literally nothing about Houston and Tulane. What’s the story? I’m not going to take part in the action, just curious. 

      • Anonymous

        jinx factor prevented earlier response, but,

        56-0
        49-42
        56-3
        63-28
        73-34
        56-13
        73-17 (tonite)

        houston can score some points against c-usa defenses.

        a houston/bama sugar bowl would be fascinating.

        • Anonymous

          73 points, snap.

        • Anonymous

          Almost as if John Jenkins never left…

        • Anonymous

          Almost as if John Jenkins never left…

      • Anonymous

        jinx factor prevented earlier response, but,

        56-0
        49-42
        56-3
        63-28
        73-34
        56-13
        73-17 (tonite)

        houston can score some points against c-usa defenses.

        a houston/bama sugar bowl would be fascinating.

  • Dlf04

    I enjoy reading these breakdowns. I listened to the Pat Shurmur’s Monday press conference online. He explained that there was only one passing play against the Texans that the didn’t have 1 lineman for 1 blitzing Texan. Meaning there should not have been any free blitzers. Therefore, as he explained, there was no need for hot routes, except for on the one play that there was one more blitzer lineman. Whether that was on Colt McCoy or the center not adjusting the blocking, I don’t know.

    • Anonymous

      i wonder if coach pat considers the free shot to have been a helmet=helmet play since clayton does have a helmet.  or whether this was the one play where they weren’t in correct set up.

      with a pre-emptive apology for playing the monday-morning-draft game:  that brooks reed looks really good.  here’s hoping sheard develops so that we don’t have to do another ‘we passed on clay matthews’ empty whine wrt to reed.  thank goodness the rams took james laurenaitis with the pick before robo or that’d be another one.  if you havent followed the rams, you may be surprised sunday at the presence JL has on the field.

      • Anonymous

        im sure Colt will get to know him for 60ish minutes.

  • Brian Sipe

    First-round pick update: Defensive tackle Phil Taylor was the Browns’ first-round draft pick in the spring and has been a starter since Game 1. His past few games, however, he has been less noticeable and his production has tapered off. After logging 23 tackles in his first five games, Taylor has only three in his past three combined. “He might have leveled off some in the last couple of weeks,” Jauron said. “It’s a long season, and for a rookie, it gets particularly long.”

  • Brian Sipe

    First-round pick update: Defensive tackle Phil Taylor was the Browns’ first-round draft pick in the spring and has been a starter since Game 1. His past few games, however, he has been less noticeable and his production has tapered off. After logging 23 tackles in his first five games, Taylor has only three in his past three combined. “He might have leveled off some in the last couple of weeks,” Jauron said. “It’s a long season, and for a rookie, it gets particularly long.”

  • Anonymous

    Can anyone suggest a book on things like this?  I’m a crazy passionate Browns fan and think I understand the game okay, but would like to learn a bit more of the finer details like this.  I never played the game, so there’s a ton I don’t know, obviously.

    Might be able to direct my anger a little better that way.

    • Anonymous

      “Take Your Eye Off the Ball” by Pat Kirwan is rod’s favorite.

  • Anonymous

    Came across the article below  and I thought that it might be relevant to the interests of people who read Xs and Os. 

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203716204577015903150731054.html

Previous post:

Next post: