Xs and Os with the Bros: All About (Travis) Benjamin

by Cleveland Frowns on August 14, 2012

Welcome to the first 2012 edition of “Xs and Os with the Bros” by Xs and Os editor @rodofdisaster. This feature represents a basic attempt to dive deeper into the game of football, learn something about the X’s and O’s that make it go, and better appreciate the games within the game. It’s called “Xs and Os with the Bros” because you don’t have to be a former player/coach or a rocket surgeon to get something out of taking a closer look at a football play, so please enjoy the post and the discussion in the comments.

This week Rod focuses on the positive: Brandon Weeden’s 34-yard completion to Travis Benjamin in the first quarter of Friday night’s preseason opener in Detroit. 

—————

Preseason Week 1 @Detroit
Situation: 1st quarter, 12:18 to go
Down & Distance: 2nd & 7 from Browns 43

The Browns are in 11 personnel (1 RB, 1TE, 3 WR). In the West Coast Offense, this grouping is called “Posse”. The TE (Cameron) is tight to the left and he is the “Y”. Little is in the slot to the right, and Gordon is split out wide to the same side. Gordon is marked X and Little is marked “Slot”. Benjamin is the flanker, or “Z”, at the top of your screen.

The Lions are in Nickel and you can see their personnel identified above. The defensive line is over shifted and the end at the bottom of your screen is in a “wide 9” position (Outside shoulder of center is 1-technique, guard is 3, tackle is 5 and TE is 7). There are two deep safeties and the corners are squared up on their man. This is meant to look like 2 deep safety coverage. The strongside LB has alignment with our RB. The nickel back has Little.

The Pass Pattern

Here we see Weeden dropping back to pass. The asterisk is meant to show very good pass protection by Mack on Suh and Pinkston on Corey Williams.  Schwartz has kicked out to cut off the angle of the wide-9 end. Joe Thomas is, well, Joe Thomas. Hardesty is check releasing.

The defense is clearly in man-to-man coverage with corners on all three receivers and the SS on Cameron.  The SAM LB has Hardesty and the Mike LB is playing a shallow zone looking for crossers. When the Mike does that, it’s called “Robber”. That 2-deep look has now shifted as the FS (can’t see in this photo) rotates to the middle of the field. This is “Cover-1 Robber”.

The patterns run by the offense are as follows: Benjamin and Gordon are running mirror fade routes (fade is like a fly/streak pattern but it angles toward the sideline). Cameron is running what looks like either a fly pattern or a skinny post.  Little is crossing underneath after the clear outs in what the WCO calls a “drive” route. The interesting thing here is that while Benjamin is beating his man, Gordon has single coverage and a safety rotating away from him on the other side. Either of them theoretically has a matchup advantage and, if not, Little should be open late on the cross.

Here we see that Benjamin has his man beaten easily and, although he had to slow down a half-step, he makes a nice catch on a pretty nice ball and manages to keep both feet in bounds for a 34-yard gain.

ANALYSIS

“Speed kills. You can’t teach speed. Everything else in the game can be taught, but speed is a gift from God.”   -Al Davis

When the Cleveland Browns entered the 2009 2010 2011  2012 preseason the lingering question on offense was about the wide receiver position. This had been a definite Achilles’ heel and fixing it seemed to be the mantra of every offseason in recent memory. Much to the consternation of the fanbase the Browns passed on a number of receivers in the first three rounds of the draft before selecting University of Miami’s Travis Benjamin in round #4.

Review of some video highlights of Travis showed that he’s undersized but legitimately fast. I thought to myself that this pick would perhaps do more to change the fortunes of the Browns offense than either Richardson or Weeden. In addition to leading the league in drops, the wide receiving corps in recent years also lacked one other thing: top end speed; and now seemingly they have it.

As this play above demonstrates, Benjamin is a handful for a DB who doesn’t jam him on the line and let him get acceleration. This type of speed cannot be ignored by the defense or else they’ll give up a big play like this one. If they then choose to play a safety back (cover-2), that helps the running game, as well as the underneath passing routes as there’s one less defender in the shallow zones. If they double just Benjamin then everyone else has a one on one matchup assuming they rush four and the Mike is in Robber or blitzes. It’s a win-win for the offense.

I like Trent Richardson very much and Weeden appeals to most as a replacement for McCoy but I indicated early on after the draft that Travis Benjamin might be the key to success in 2012. He doesn’t need to catch a great number of passes to do it. Just being on the field and helping to manipulate defenses can make him a very effective weapon by what he forces opponents to do.

—————

The full “Xs and Os with the Bros” archive is available here.

  • ClevelandFrowns

    Cribbs: “As long as we’re winning, I’ll sit there and score 100 touchdowns on returns and make 100 tackles. You won’t hear me unless we’re not winning off the break (bye week Nov. 11) and I know I can help us win.”

    http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/08/post_128.html

    • BIKI024

      he obviously got a hold of some of that brown frown he was pushin back at KSU

      • bupalos

        A drug that makes you hallucinate 100 Browns touchdowns is a very good drug indeed.

    • bupalos

      100 touchdowns!

      I’m going to need to factor this in to my Cheddar picks.

    • Petefranklin

      100 touchdowns? Did they rehire their special teams coach from SF?

  • wiseoldredbeard

    Nice x and o, Rod. Question, if Richardson is in there instead of Hardesty, do you think the LBs or safeties come up closer to the line to try to stuff the run? What effect (if any) would it have on their positioning?

    • BIKI024

      probably not on a 2nd and 7, but I’m sure there will be plenty of situations where they will stack the line, and hopefully Weeden has the freedom to audible a play. of course most defenses disguise pretty well, so that will be another learning curve for Weeden to adjust to as well.

      • rodofdisaster

        I agree with Biki. I would also point out that the surprising thing to me is that they’d even disguise a defense in preseason. Seems like an aggressive call on defense and honestly, I don’t see why anyone plays anything other than 2-deep man or zone in preseason.

    • bupalos

      In motion the safety on the left side at least is moving up at the snap–not necessarily for the run but they’ve got the shallow cross and post (cameron has to be cutting in it seems to me) covered with 4 guys. They’ve obviously overcommitted to the short middle, I don’t know that it gets better with a better RB in there. Weeden made a good play here with a guy pushing back towards him, so far this is exhibit a that he can read and handle some pressure. Hoping there is an exhibit b at some point.

      I wasn’t sure that was called as a fade, it seems more like Weeden just threw it that way.

      • BIKI024

        seems to me that it’s always better with a better RB, keeps the defense on their toes because with a guy like Trent, if the defense guesses wrong, he can pop off a 20+ yarder in no time.

        • bupalos

          I just mean that defense is already very aggressive. Sure, Trent can’t but help.

          Checked the replay again on the Browns website and that should have gone for 6, Benjamin actually has slight inside position on the corner as the ball is thrown and the dude is toasted a lot worse than it looks like when the ball comes in. Any less towards the sideline and we’re thinking touchdowns.

          • BIKI024

            baby steps, beggars can’t be choosers.. when we’ve only had 1 season out of last 10 since we’ve had a QB who can make that throw, I’ll take it. but sure, hopefully next time he hits him in stride and TB goes for 6.

          • dubbythe1

            sometimes i think we should have a running tally over the course of the season matching Shurmur’s “Battled”,”Flashed”, etc v.s. your “hopefully”,etc.
            ;-)

  • nj0
    • NeedsFoodBadly

      I’m most disappointed that they didn’t include a photo of A-Rod’s painting of himself as a centaur.

    • BIKI024

      Stray-Rod is proving that Wahoo the Wingman is a ladies killer!

      come on Pay-Rod, i thought the real estate market in Florida tanked!?! you buy it for $24m in 2010 and selling for $38m?? sweet feathury jesus

      • mo_by_dick

        Filet-Rod, Chambray-Rod, Cachet-Rod

  • mo_by_dick

    Thanks for the breakdown. Do you think Benjamin on the outside and Little in the slot is something we can expect a lot of, or does this system treat them as basically interchangeable?

    • rodofdisaster

      Hard to say. I think we’ll see Benjamin in the slot or as the Z. Little will probably play all three and Gordon may play X or Z depending on how much he picks up.

  • Ron

    What identifies the Nickel as a Nickel and not a Will in this play? To my untrained eye, the formation looked like a vanilla 4-3. Was the idea to disguise the Nickel as a Will?

    • BIKI024

      the jersey number(s) tips off the offense on whether it’s a nickel DB or LB. in this case, I believe #23 was the guy lined up near, but not quite where the Will lines up in a 4-3 vanilla, which would make him a DB, and with 2 LB’s on other side (based on their jersey numbers), makes this a Nickel formation

      • rodofdisaster

        You are correct. I doubt the positioning would be different were he a Will backer so I had to look to identify the player and yes, he’s a DB

        • Ron

          Thank you both for your replies. It’s always good to learn something new!

    • nj0

      Am I wrong in thinking that nickel is a designation of the personnel package on the field rather than a specific alignment?

      4-3 seems to be used interchangably to apply to both personnel (4DL, 3LB, 4DB) or the formation generally associated with the personnel set .

      • BIKI024

        you are correct, Nickel (and Dime) is a designation of personnel package, referring to how many DB’s there are in the package.

        Nickel = 5 DBs, or 1 extra DB in place of an LB, typically an outside one. the most common formation is 4-2-5 (4 lineman, 2 LBs, 5 DBs) but there are some teams that run a 3-3-5.

        Dime = 6 DBs. 4-1-6 or 3-2-6

        alignment varies depending on whether it’s a zone, man-to-man, blitz, and all the various subcategories and disguises, etc.

  • The Cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugs

    Really it’s a simple play, but now that you have the pieces that can execute it (More accurate/power in QB, fast WR one side, big WR on other side), the big play is there for the taking.

    Nice analysis as always Rod. Along with Cheddar Bay and Pete’s lunatic ravings/cravings for LeBron, it’s one the best things on the site.

  • rgrunds

    No one is allowed to comment. You can only repeat what Rod says verbatim.

    that is all

  • CleveLandThatILove

    Thanks Rod! Love the wider shots.

    Fingers crossed that Weeden is a quick study on reading the D and making adjustments.

  • rgrunds

    FrOrange. There’s no such thing as a “Rocket Surgeon”.

    Can I help you with the alphabet later?

    Best wishes.

    • Ron

      Au contraire mon frere. A Rocket Surgeon is a rare breed that performs brain surgery whilst simultaneously engineering improvements to our missile defense system.

      • rgrunds

        You are so right. I’m just out of touch. While I have your attention, I have to tell you about my new theory of combustion. It’s involves Phlogiston……

    • dubbythe1

      I’ve always used the term “Rocket Calculus”.

  • ClevelandFrowns
    • Petefranklin

      WE’RE NOT DETROIT! WE’RE NOT DETROIT!

  • jimkanicki

    rod — nice work as always. in the second pic, little looks to be breaking free over the middle and for the past couple years, our qb would have taken their five yard completion and moved on.

    what’s your take on the biggest factor for enabling a downfield play like this? good protection? patient qb? fast WR?

    • rgrunds

      It works if Little can catch the ball. 4 drops per game changes a strategy.

    • bupalos

      Any QB who would throw a short middle crossing pattern with that setup should not be a QB.

      Looking at you, every Browns quarterback of the past 3 years.

    • rodofdisaster

      The downfield play takes a couple of factors. I’d rank them this way:

      1) Blocking
      2) At least a little separation or position on the defender
      3) The QB being able to get it there. Patience is important but I would say the QB also has to anticipate. The QB and he have to be on the same page

      As for the WR, faster is better in the sense that a fast receiver might allow the QB to take a faster setup (ie., five step drop) and throw long as opposed to a seven step drop. Not sure if that’s really all that important but the play develops faster.

  • nj0

    Since we’re tossing out questions – somebody here (forget who) posted a screencap where Shurmur was way down the sideline away from the line of scrimmage on an offensive snap (a 3rd down, I think).

    As someone who has never been on a sideline or played football (HS debate forever), is this abnormal? Is it something worth critiquing? Big deal, small deal, no deal?

    • jimkanicki

      i posted that and i share your curiosity.

      it seems strange to me that he was so far away from the LOS and also that he was disengaged from coaches and players. but… yeah. i dont know if it’s a big deal or no deal.

      • nj0

        it sure does seem to serve as a metaphor for something.

        but then again maybe every coach does that? never paid attention.

    • dubbythe1

      even in these screen caps, he is 10-15yds ahead of the play, but at least he is looking at the field.

  • Beeej
    • bupalos

      Great link. Thanks!

    • ClevelandFrowns

      Really good read.

  • Petefranklin

    Solid $$$ coming in on the over 40 vs Green Bay, it was 38 for openers. Any thoughts?? I like the Packers minus 3 a lot even with the Browns starters playing a half.

    • BIKI024

      wow, and I thought I was a degenerate.

      • Petefranklin

        Whats degenerate about 3-0 in the preseason? 15k on over 75 wins without a comeback the other way on under 79, on a team that loses 11 in a row is pretty degenerate unless you could care less about cash. Now about Thursday night?

        • BIKI024

          i don’t wager on preseason, but mazel tov on your successes

          • Petefranklin

            Rootin for you too! I’m on Tribe time again tonight as a nice fat dog and the indians are actually about .500 when Ubaldo starts this year.

      • Petefranklin

        And two of those were the unders last night, still laughing.

  • https://twitter.com/jimkanicki jimkanicki

    from grossi today:

    “How has Weeden’s demeanor been, bouncing back from a less-than-great first game?” Pat Shurmur was asked on Tuesday by a member of the media I respect.

    If looks could kill …

    Clenching his tongue between his teeth, Shurmur responded, …

    what a child. does the coach not understand that media and fans have their roles to play in this whole enterprise? does he not understand that simplistic and/or analyses by talk radio hosts do more to drive the tenor talk show calls than the actual play? and even if the fans/media got weeden’s performance wrong… so what? do your job pat.

    how can he be so utterly naive and so uncomposed? has there been a coach whose buttons are more easily pushed since bud carson?

    granted holmgrum set the bar low with his childish scolding of cleveland media last year. that culture will be tended to within 24 hours of the owners approval of haslam.

    time to start some prop bets. brosef could only get a +150 on ‘weeden qb rating better than luck’. i want a line on the shurmur firing. i see ‘interim coach childress’ right around week 12. where’s petefranklin?

    • BIKI024

      did you watch the presser???

      • https://twitter.com/jimkanicki jimkanicki

        no but i’m assuming grossi did.

        • BIKI024

          yeah well check the tape or it didn’t happen. grossi grossly exaggerated

          • Petefranklin

            Agreed on that ,Grossi stirring the pot again.And thanks Coach Pat for letting us dumb people know that” slowing the game down” is an industry term referring to how well a player is picking up the game and reacting accordingly. Dont know what I would have done if it wasn’t on Wikipedia(if it is). And no wonder coaches get pissed at the media…Q) will Gocong be back this year? Cmon man, Clark Kent would be out at least 6 months with a torn achilles.

      • https://twitter.com/jimkanicki jimkanicki

        yeah, perhaps grossi added his own flavor. fair.

        BUT. grossi was probably standing within 10 feet and probably picked up the vibe in the group. also when the response leads with ‘you guys are painting..’ etc., it’s a defensive finger-pointing-ish response.

        • BIKI024

          i watched the presser yesterday, and didn’t notice that, and just watched it again. there was no biting of his tongue, etc. i don’t mind him getting BWeed’s back. afterall, the kid only had 9 pass attempts for pete’s sake.

          • Petefranklin

            Sounded like Shurmers going to let it rip with Weeden thursday night.

        • BIKI024

          If Bernie loves him, I love him

      • nj0

        I watched it without sound to see if I could pick the moment. Nope, sorry. Couldn’t do it.

        Thank god for the internet.

    • GrandRapidsRustlers

      How about week 10? Would 1-8 at the bye week do it?

      I’m just going to enjoy the young guys and betting the over on all Browns games.

    • Petefranklin

      Most passing yards 2012/13 season A Luck 25/1 Field (Weeden,McCoy, others not listed in the top 17 QB’s) 10/1@ Cantor. T Richardson 18/1 most rushing yards same as S Jax better than Gore/Turner/D. Murray/R Bush@ 20/1 and Forte/wells@25/1

Previous post:

Next post: